An interpretation of the killer angels by michael shaara

Much dialogue in the movie comes directly from the book. His men loved him unconditionally. It is perhaps the most second-guessed decision of the war. The people who look at you like a piece of filth, a cockroach, ah.

We know by the way that each character is described and portrayed in their chapters that the men involved in this gory battle were by no means evil creatures. But due to a series of problems, the Confederates were forced to retreat from Gettysburg with terrible losses and never again would move into Union territory.

Some historians argue that had the Confederates won, they might have gone on to win the entire war, although this is not a universal view. On the other side, Chamberlain, who in effect is the chief spokesman for the Union cause, thinks more in terms of the ability of men to shape their own future democratically rather than invoking the will of God as the power that dictates what happens in human affairs.

For Chamberlain, the cause for which he is fighting transcends simple patriotism and attains a universal meaning: Army's recommended reading list for Officer Professional Development.

The battle smells of desperation. Grant, who became commander of the Union armies in While much of his characterization and novelistic interpretation is based on careful study of letters, documents, and historical texts, Shaara does take significant liberties in his portrayal of the characters and their inner thoughts and emotions.

What kept me able and willing to read more constantly was the mere fact that through reading the book I felt as though I understood thoroughly what each person felt, consequently allowing me to learn so much more about what occurred at Gettysburg.

Shaara presents an equal interpretation of both sides positions and a message is revealed: Bravery is not just for Custeresque men like General Winfield Scott Hancock who inspired such loyalty from his acquaintances, even those dressed in gray, such as his best friend General Lewis Armistead.

He has an idealistic view of what America stands for: They fight for land, or because a king makes them, or just because they like killing. You can see the famous fishhook deployment of the Union troops in blue.

A Union loss at Gettysburg would have put the capital in jeopardy.See a complete list of the characters in The Killer Angels and in-depth analyses of General Robert E. Lee, Colonel Joshua L. Chamberlain, and General James Longstreet. Discussion of themes and motifs in Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels.

Customer reviews

eNotes critical analyses help you gain a deeper understanding of The Killer Angels so you can excel on your essay or test. The Killer Angels is a historical novel by Michael Shaara that was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in In my last post, I began to discuss Michael Shaara’s aesthetic choices for constructing The Killer Angels as he did, and how he adopted a Lost Cause-interpretation of Robert E.

Lee as a. More Essay Examples on History Rubric Truth be told, if a reader is looking for a historically accurate account of the Battle of Gettysburg, one of the bloodiest and certainly most pivotal battles of the American Civil War, Michael Shaara’s “The Killer Angels” is not the best choice of works.

The Killer Angel's. English STUDY. PLAY. The Killer Angels.

The Killer Angels

Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels portrays actual historical figures & the actual events in which they participated during the Civil War. While much of his characterization and novelistic interpretation is based on careful study of letters, documents, & historical texts.

An interpretation of the killer angels by michael shaara
Rated 5/5 based on 83 review